UFO Sighting Reports
We have some great reports this week, and even a photograph sent in by one of our readers from Oregon, so let's check it out.
California-03-01-07-Witnesses were driving along when suddenly a gold flash of light came through the sky. They could first see the light through their sunroof, and thought it might be a shooting star. The object was shaped like a boomerang, and moved very fast in a zig-zag pattern. Several witnesses in the car saw the object as it simply and suddenly disappeared from sight.
Iowa-03-05-07-Witness was in hot tub after 8:00 PM, and looking up into the eastern sky saw two objects flying in an echelon pattern. Objects were heading northerly. Objects traveled from the constellation of Leo's throat to the handle of the Big Dipper in about 10 seconds. The objects were a dim, fuzzy orange color. They eventually faded from view.
Oregon-January, 2007-From an about.com reader-About two months ago I pointed my 6.2 mp digital HP 717 camera at the night sky in my back yard and took three photos a minute or so apart. I didn't see anything... I was just testing the camera and checking out what it would do.
About two weeks ago I had the photos on Picasa2 and they were 'black'. I moved the 'lighten' bar and objects 'jumped' into view. I then used Picasa2 to adjust the shadow and light... but NOT the color. Every color you see just came into being as I adjusted the shadow and light. Because of this experience, that is photographing 'something' in the night sky, I'm going to get a 12 mp camera. What might a 12 mp camera have shown? See image above and right.
Pennsylvania-03-03-07-Witness was waiting for a phone call while on the second story of his house. He looked out the window, and saw a very bright light, which at first, he thought was a star. But, the object was so bright and moving that he thought it was a UFO. It made abrupt moves upward and to subjects left. Object then descended below a line of trees, and never was seen again.
Texas-03-01-07-After 11:00 PM, witness was watching television with his girlfriend. The television was at a medium volume when the witness' attention was drawn outside by a very deep, loud, hum. The hum was continuous, so the witness went outside to check it out. Soon, he saw the source of the sound, it was a cluster of lights, multi-colored and shaped like a hat. The object was slowly descending. He called his girlfriend who also saw the objects. Before long, the lights all merged into one, and the sound stopped. The sighting was reported to the Del Rio Police department.
Virginia-03-01-07-Witness was visiting Christopher Newport University campus on March 1st. He later met up with his friends, and they decided to go to a local park and play flashlight tag. About an hour into the game, witness looked up into the sky because of the Moons brightness. Witness then noticed that it was not the Moon, but an unknown object giving off the light. Going to tell his friends about his sighting, he realized they too were watching the object. The object was cigar-shaped. The witnesses felt strangely tranquil as they watched the UFO. It finally disappeared.
Well, that's going to do it for another week, so until next time, keep your eyes on the skies.
Comments
Hi
I live in Newmarket sufflok England
When i was seeing my pet rabbit one night i saw this weird flying object in the sky i was wondering should i get a camra or not i thought no.
I took my rabbit inside to get his rabbit eye drops when i came out side there was a big white flash everythink was white when it stoped and i looked into the sky it was gone.
Dear Sirs!The information, contained in the project is
> in my
> opinion
> the evidence of its extraterrestrial origin.
>
> Project
> of decoding of ‘The Stormer Effect’
>
> The phenomenon is described by C.Stormer in his
> work ‘The
> Problem of Aurora Borealis’ in the chapter
> entitled ‘The
> Echo of Short Waves, Which Comes Back in Many Seconds
> After
> The Main Signal’.
>
> In 1928 the radio- engineer Jorgen Hals from Bigder
> near Oslo
> informed C.Stormer about an odd radio echo received 3
> seconds after the cessation of the main signal;
> besides, an
> ordinary echo encircling the Earth within 1/7 of a
> second
> was received.
>
> In July Prof. Stormer spoke to Dr. Van-der-Paul in
> Andhoven
> and they decided to carry out experiments in autumn
> and send
> telegraphic signals in the form of undamped waves
> every 20
> seconds three dashes one after the other. On 11
> October 1928
> between 15.30 and 16.00, C.Stormer heard an
> echo ‘beyond any
> doubt’; the signals lasted for 1,5- 2 seconds on
> undamped
> waves 31,4 meters long.
>
> Stormer and Hals recorded the intervals between the
> main
> signal and the mysterious echo:
> 1) 15, 9, 4, 8, 13, 8, 12, 10, 9, 5, 8, 7, 6
> 2) 12, 14, 14, 12, 8
> 3) 12, 5, 8
> 4) 12, 8, 5, 14, 14, 15, 12, 7, 5.5, 13, 8, 8, 8, 13,
> 9,10,7,14,6,9,5
>
> 5) 9
>
> Atmospheric disturbances were insignificant at that
> time.
> The frequency of echoes was equal to that of the main
> signal. C.Stormer explained the nature of echoes by
> reflection of radio waves from layers of particles
> ionised
> by the Sun. But!
>
> The Professor of the Stenford Electrotechnical
> University
> R.Bracewell suggested possibility of informational
> communication through space probes between more or less
> developed civilisations in space. From that point of
> view
> the information about decoding of Stormer series can be
> found in following journals:
>
> ‘Smena’ No.2 Moscow 1966 , ‘Astronautics and
> Aeronautics’
> No.5 USA 1973, ‘Technika Molodezi’ No.4 1974 and No.5
> 1977
> Moscow, etc.
>
> The author of this work offers the following decoding:
> let
> the numbers in the series be replaced for chemical
> symbols
> of elements with corresponding nuclear charges:
> 1) P F Be O Al O Mg Ne F B O N C
> 2) Mg Si Si Mg O
> 3) Mg B O
> 4) Mg O B Si Si P Mg N B B Al O O O Al F Ne N Si C F B
> 5) F
>
> It is easy to see that the second series is repeated
> at the
> beginning of the forth series with the only difference
> that
> in the forth series silicon is alloyed with boron and
> phosphorus, i.e. ‘p-n transition’ of a diode is
> created. The
> third series describes receipt of pure boron through
> action
> on boron anhydrite by magnesium:
> B2O3 and Mg = B …
>
> The author of the above hypothesis wrote his degree
> paper on
> silicon carbide light-emitting diode, that is why the
> ending of the forth series is the most simple- it is a
> modern light-emitting diode. Silicon carbide is
> alloyed with
> nitrogen and boron with ’some participation’ of
> fluorine.
> Approximately the same way diamond is alloyed with
> participation of fluorine in laboratories of ‘other
> civilisations’, as can be seen at the ending of the
> first
> series. In the middle of the forth series corundum,
> the base
> of ruby, is also alloyed with boron, nitrogen and
> fluorine.
> In the fifth series simply fluorine is educed as a
> useful
> but very aggressive gas. Inert neon seems to divide
> optoelectronic devices.
>
> In conclusion, some repeated applications should be
> noticed:
> fluorine favours in a way either diffusion of boron or
> electronic processes in forbidden zones of diamond,
> silicon
> carbamide; for some reason magnesium contacts are used.
>
> Now,MgB2 is supercoductor!!! (2001?)!!!
> ===================================================
> ======
> In 1928 semi-conductor devices were not in use on
> Earth.
> It was made in Leningrad,1978.
>
> P.S.This paper is placed in Internet from 1998,please
> see at:
> http://www.belarus.net/discovery/filipenko/fil2.htm
>
> (in English)
> ===================================================
> ==
> Superconductivity in diamond, Nature, 428, 542 (2004)
> Origin of Superconductivity in Boron-doped Diamond.
> ===================================================
> =====
> All this discoveries are placed in series of C.Stormer!
>
> http://home.ural.ru/~filip
> Sincerely, Henadzi Filipenka,6a-7 Boldina str.Grodno
> 230030
> Belarus
> P.S.
> Superconductivity in doped cubic silicon
> E. Bustarret1,7, C. Marcenat3,7, P. Achatz1,3, J. Kamarik1,4, F.
LЁ¦vy3,
> A. Huxley3,8, L. OrtЁ¦ga2, E. Bourgeois5, X. Blase5, D. DЁ¦barre6 and
J.
> Boulmer6
>
> Laboratoire d’Etudes des PropriЁ¦tЁ¦s Electroniques des Solides,
> Laboratoire de Cristallographie, CNRS, BP166, 38042 Grenoble, France
>
>
>
> http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7118/abs
> /nature05340.html
>
> 2006.