The Drones: Still a Mystery
More than a year later, although many have a given the photos a "fake" stamp, I personally still have my doubts. It's not that I "want to believe," but I want to know the truth. I believe that it is possible that some of the drone photographs may be computer generated, but the question remains, "Are all of them hoaxes?" Could one or two copy cats have negated the validity of a couple of the objects that were actual craft?
Now, there are a couple of private detectives on the case. They have begun their inquiries by attempting to find the exact power pole that some of the Capitola, California, photographs were taken near.
Private eyes Frankie Dixon, and T.K. Davis, are hot on the trail of the drones, and hope to put an end to the mystery of the photographs. Having seen and studied all of the photographs, it seems strange to me that if they had doubts of the authenticity of the images, they would put the time and effort in to prove that the strange, unknown objects could be the real thing. Now, keep in mind that if the photographs could be proven to be authentic, that would only prove that the object is real, and in no way give us any indication of its origin. Take a look at A UFO Cold Case-Sleuths Pursue the Drone Mystery, and see what you think.
What is your opinion on the drone objects: Are they the real thing, or just well done computer generated hoaxes?
Comments
an expert should analyze the photos. I think someone out there could tell if it has a possiblity of being real or not. The object would indeed need to be behind each wire and not overlapped. Who is raj? If the experts think it’s a fake, who cares who raj is. The two detectives better ask for payment in advance. $100/hour to look for Raj who took a pic of a telephone pole? Insane!
I have to admit they are the starngest objects I have seen. From one angle they look like a celling fan but not from the above shot.
I’m not a digital expert, but when I blew up the image in PaintShop Pro, there were visible squares around the “drone” — but nowhere else, for example, none on the trees or bushes. Looked pasted in to me.
Seems likely that the drone and Raj and others who supposedly photographed it but cannot be found are all creations of “Isaac.”
Unless the quality of the photogrpahs are evry poor so that when you zoom in you get thsoe pixels.
sorry but those pictures look photo shopped , untill i see more info these photos are fake looking
yes they do look kinda fishy but you never know.
Doesn’t anyone else remember seeing a video of somebody with this in a parking lot, making it hover with a remote control? It was about 6 feet in length. I was sure I saw the video on this web site, but maybe not.
yeah that is one way it could work that isn’t alien related.
When you zoom in you get those pixels yes — but ONLY on the drone. They don’t show up on other features in the picture. Looks to me like it came from a separate photo that was combined with another background / foreground.
And what’s with “Isaac”? Supposedly he didn’t want to be identified yet he babbles on like the Unabomber and surely he is aware that every word and phrase out of his mouth improves the chances of identification.
Seems as tho his major contribution is lovely photos of the materials that were used to create the hoax.
Quite a brilliant job I think — but tacky.
I first saw the pictures of the drone(s) in a UFO casefile on another website. The pictues, to me, look like capable computer graphics applied to a laughable model. MUFON has a PowerPoint presentation analyzing the photos. In all honesty, I would be glad to be proven wrong, but I am of the opinion that the drone is a hokey hoax.
Yeah the pixels do show up only on the drones which would mean they were placed there.
As i understand it these photos have already been proven fake.. Some guy made some spectacular models and flew them by remote control. Unfortunately I can’t remember the web-site either.
Well if thats’ the case I guess it solves this one.
of all the 100 years of modern UFO photos these images are the strangest and most bizarre UFO shapes seen! what about the information contained in the CARET Report? Dual phase gravity? Rigid spacial relationships? WOW new concepts…..LOVE IT!
never heard of it but it sounds intresting and complicated on how it works.
reguardinding #7 commment…..i saw that picture of the guy in the parking lot…and have been trying to find it again…no luck. but i know i saw it. its a model on radio control.
My hobby is photography and I have two digital cameras. I enlarged the photos and to me they break up on the drone and the trees in the same way. The blue fringing is the same in fine objects on different areas of the pictures. Lighting, edging, clarity etc. all seem to indicate a genuine photo.
If these are fakes, they are very well done. If they are models, the guy who made them is good. If they are real - ZOWIE!
It is an unfortunate paradox in the UFO-chasing business that we clamor for good, clear pics, but when such pics appear the first thing everyone says is, “too good to be true”. I tend to lean toward one of the first two theories simply because so many (most) really good pics and videos have turned out to have been faked.
More than anything else, to me the “alien lettering” on the craft just looks too contrived. Granted, I’m no expert on extraterrestrial language forms, but I have to ask why the script is so obvious and clear. We terrestrials use markings like this for commercial and military purposes, but even now the military is moving away from the bright, clear identifying markings used many years ago.
Back when visual identification of friend or foe was the norm, such bright markings were necessary. However, with advanced technology and IFF (Identification, Friend/Foe) systems now in use, bright markings are for the most part just so much decoration. I have to believe that a civilization that is technologically advanced enough to develop exotic propulsion systems would have no need to decorate its vehicles with bright, bold script.
I reluctantly must take the position that these photos are very well done fakes. But I would love to be proved wrong!
maybe the laangauge sin’t for tem at al,maybe it is for us to see and figure out.
i dont know what is it
not a celling fan which at first is what it looked like to me.
lol guys that drone was part of a halo 3 promo - thats when the images appeared on the net, just a month prior to halo 3’s release on the xbox 360.
Wow,talk about someone with nothing better to do.