As promised, here is part two of our report on the anomalous object that fell into Bantam Lake in April of 2012. Our eyewitness, a professional photographer, had no knowledge of the whale-sized object, he was simply taking photographs.
The photos he was taking had something wrong with them, a problem he had never experienced before. They had strange specks in them. Later, after examining his equipment he found the strange specks on the back of his camera. He sent his photographs to a local newspaper, who advised him to send them to NASA. Why? Because of the events a month earlier.
See his report at Strange Photographs from Connecticut, and be sure to comment as you wish.
Comments
” no divers?”
Billy,
I’d be interested to know what a camera expert (familiar with his specific camera) thinks of the spots and the effect to the actual camera. Was it snowing, raining, or misting that night? Seems obvious – but…
Did anyone else experience this at all there (with so many folks owning cells with cameras now)?
Any follow up on the main event? It would be interesting to know if the search for the supposed down plane (in Part 1) resulted in ANY finds (even anything just out of the ordinary)?
Thanks!
I wouldn’t send any to NASA.
Sounds like someone is trying to whip up some publicity for his sister’s book.
Why did he call the newspaper just because he had specks on his camera and photos? Especially if he hadn’t even heard about the sighting that was reported earlier?