We have a new report posted that was only reported recently. It occurred on July 13, over Ontario, Canada. The article details the report of two disc-shaped UFOs that shadowed a small craft. The incident was seen from the ground by a sky watcher.
It was about 10:15 PM, when the reporter from St. Catherines spotted a plane with the usual navigation lights. To get a better view, he took his binoculars and aimed at the plane; what he saw shocked him.
Check out his report at Report of UFOs Shadowing Small Airplane in Ontario, Canada, and be sure to leave your comments.
Comments
The report was very interesting, the writer being specific and descriptive. My only question is, with the lack of illumination would they have been able to clearly see the described objects through binoculars? I’ve never used binoculars in the dark of night but while they magnify whatever you are looking at I don’t see how they would have aided seeing something that the lack of light didn’t allow to be seen from the ground. Could somebody clarify?
Anybody who is caught up in the
“ufo light in the sky” videos
is missing the ENTIRE point completely.
Many ufo EXPERTS believe that the ONLY time a ufo materializes is to ABDUCT a PERSON.
The only people who blithely talk about “contact” and “disclosure” are those
WHO HAVE NEVER BEEN ABDUCTED, TORTURED, and RAPED by a UFO.
THIS IS THE REALITY OF “CONTACT.”
THIS IS THE REALITY OF DISCLOSURE.
UFO’s and extraterrestrials do NOT exist .
Really?
……I’m undecided about extraterrestrials visiting our planet; but, the scientific community, in near unanimity, believes that the chances of there being NO intelligent life forms in the universe is virtually nil.
Along the same line, the scientific community, with less unanimity (but a clear majority) no longer doubts the existence of UFO’s. There is great debate as to WHAT they are or are not…..but their existence is undeniable by anyone who does a modicum of research.
This is an interesting report for a number of reasons:
The reporter apparently has a good command of the night sky, thus reducing the unlikely chance that he was seeing stars or some other aerial phenomenon (swamp gas!) by mistake.
He used binoculars to better observe the UFOs. His binocs are a good brand name and 10X50 is an excellent power optic for both magnification and the exit pupil ratio (re brightness of image under reduced lighting conditions) for such an observation.
The fact that he lost the image of the UFOs when he looked away and then returned, is not an uncommon occurrence. Previous witnesses have reported similar phenomena– it appears that the UFOs can somehow sense being observed and can render themselves invisible (cloaking?) especially when the witness looks away briefly. A similar phenomenon concerns witnesse who are vercome with a sense of reluctance to want to continue watching or even remembering having made such an observation.
I would have liked to read of more details regarding the observation, but specific additional details are often just not possible by the witness.