1. News & Issues
You can opt-out at any time. Please refer to our privacy policy for contact information.

Discuss in my forum

Billy Booth

Beautiful Object Seen over Spokane, Washington

By March 17, 2014

Follow me on:

Our latest article details a recent sighting in the state of Washington. It occurred on February 5, 2014, and its eyewitness is the son of an airplane pilot. The father and son had discussed planes many times, and son had gained a good knowledge of the subject.

The UFO in this report was seen for over 40 minutes. It constantly changed colors, and the witness described it as a 'beautiful object. This case is a bit different than other reports in that the UFO did create a loud noise; enough to wake the witness from sleep.

See the details at Beautiful Object Seen over Spokane, Washington, and be sure to comment if you so wish.

Comments

March 17, 2014 at 3:56 pm
(1) Cheese Dip says:

Dear Billy,
Intriguing. If true, then this was a very long display expressly put on for the viewers – they were selected – deliberately woken up. To quote (or misquote) Jacques Vallee, “First, there is a physical object. [...] Second, there’s the phenomenon the witnesses perceive. [...] the third component, the social phenomenon. That’s what happens when the reports are submitted to society and enter the cultural arena.”

What are we (second-hand) being told by this event? The witnesses are awe-struck by the display. Is that the message? “We are awesome,” and to what end? Who benefits? This is Jenny Randles OZ factor – deliberate evasive absurdity by who-whatever. That’s why “rationalists” cannot comprehend the UFO phenomenon – they have no “witch blood.”
Cheers

March 20, 2014 at 4:39 pm
(2) john says:

All that time and no Pics or Vids???,,,I call BS

March 20, 2014 at 6:04 pm
(3) Cheese Dip says:

Dear Billy,
Re John’s note (comment 2)…. Very Good Point. Question… are digital images or movies less reliable than celluloid photographs – digital faking programs being freely available these days. Back in the day (~pre-2000), small objects on film were considered to be “something natural but misidentified (usually birds)” whereas close-up big things on film were considered to be fake.
Cheers

March 24, 2014 at 5:57 pm
(4) jim says:

same thing people see thing’s for a time but nobody get’s a camera or a video camera.

Leave a Comment


Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>
  1. About.com
  2. News & Issues
  3. UFOs / Aliens

©2014 About.com. All rights reserved.